REFERENCES

References and recommended readings

Borum, R. (2011). Understanding terrorist psychology. In A. Silke (Ed.), The psychology of counter-terrorism (pp. 19-33). London: Routledge.

Chinman, M., Hunter, S. B., Ebener, P., Paddock, S. M., Stillman, L., Imm, P., & Wandersman, A. (2008). The getting to outcomes demonstration and evaluation: An illustration of the prevention support system. American journal of community psychology, 41(3-4), 206-224.

Cousins, J. B., & Earl, L. M. (1992). The case for participatory evaluation. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 14(4), 397-418.

Diez, M. A. (2001). The evaluation of regional innovation and cluster policies: towards a participatory approach. European Planning Studies, 9(7), 907-923.

Doosje, B., Moghaddam, F. M., Kruglanski, A. W., de Wolf, A., Mann, L., & Feddes, A. R. (2016). Terrorism, radicalization and de-radicalization. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 79-84.

Feddes, A. R., Mann, L., De Zwart, N., & Doosje, B. (2013). Duale identiteit in een multiculturele samenleving: een longitudinale kwalitatieve effectmeting van de weerbaarheidstraining Diamant [Dual identity in a multicultural society: A longitudinal qualitative effect measurement of resilience training Diamant]. Tijdschrift voor Veiligheid, 12(4), 27–44.

Feddes, A. R., Mann, L., & Doosje, B. (2015). Increasing self‐esteem and empathy to prevent violent radicalization: a longitudinal quantitative evaluation of a resilience training focused on adolescents with a dual identity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(7), 400-411.

Feddes, A.R (2015) Socio-psychological factors involved in measures of disengagement and deradicalization and evaluation challenges in Western Europe. http://www.mei.edu/sites/default/files/Feddes.pdf

Fetterman, D., Rodríguez-Campos, L., Wandersman, A., & O’Sullivan, R. G. (2014). Collaborative, participatory, and empowerment evaluation building a strong conceptual foundation for stakeholder involvement approaches to evaluation (A Response to Cousins, Whitmore, and Shulha, 2013). American Journal of Evaluation, 35(1), 144-148.

Horgan, J. (2009). Walking away from terrorism: Accounts of disengagement from radical and extremist movements. New York, NY: Routledge.

Khandker, S. R., Koolwal, G. B., & Samad, H. A. (2010). Handbook on impact evaluation: quantitative methods and practices. Washington, D. C.: World Bank Publications.

Lub, V. (2013). Polarisation, radicalization and social policy. Evaluating the theories of change. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 9(2), 165–183.

Moghaddam, F.M. (2009) De-radicalization and the Staircase from Terrorism. In D. Canter (Ed.) The Faces of Terrorism, 277-292. Oxford: Wiley.

Radicalisation Awareness Network. (2014). Preventing radicalisation to terrorism and violent extremism: Strengthening the EU’s response. RAN Collection, Approaches, lessons learned and practices.

Reyna, V. F., & Farley, F. (2006). Risk and rationality in adolescent decision making implications for theory, practice, and public policy. Psychological science in the public interest,7(1), 1-44.

Rees, W. Y., & Aldrich, R. J. (2005). Contending cultures of counterterrorism: transatlantic divergence or convergence?. International affairs, 81(5), 905-923.

Roberti, F. (2016). Il contrario della paura [The opposite of fear]. Milano: Mondadori.

Sageman, M. (2004). Understanding Terror Networks. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Saunders, R. P., Evans, M. H., & Joshi, P. (2005). Developing a process-evaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: a how-to guide. Health Promotion Practice, 6(2), 134-147.

Van der Valk, I., & Wagenaar W. (2010). Monitor Racisme and Extremisme: The extreme right: Entry and exit. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Wandersman, A. (2013). Getting To Outcomes An Evaluation Capacity Building Example of Rationale, Science, and Practice. American Journal of Evaluation, 35(1), 100 – 106.

Wandersman, A., Alia, K., Cook, B. S., Hsu, L. L., & Ramaswamy, R. (2016). Evidence-based interventions are necessary but not sufficient for achieving outcomes in each setting in a complex world: Empowerment evaluation, Getting To Outcomes, and demonstrating accountability. American Journal of Evaluation, 37(4), 544-561.

Wandersman, A., Chien, V. H., & Katz, J. (2012). Toward an Evidence‐Based System for Innovation Support for Implementing Innovations with Quality: Tools, Training, Technical Assistance, and Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement. American journal of community psychology, 50(3-4), 445-459.

Wandersman, A., Imm, P., Chinman, M., & Kaftarian, S. (2000). Getting to outcomes: A results-based approach to accountability. Evaluation and program planning, 23(3), 389-395.

Wilner, A. S., & Dubouloz, C. J. (2010). Homegrown terrorism and transformative learning: an interdisciplinary approach to understanding radicalization. Global Change, Peace & Security, 22(1), 33-51.


Webography

RAND Corporation http://www.rand.org

OUTinOUT” EU Project https://outinoutproject.org/

Erasmus+ Project Results Platform http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/erasmus-plus/projects/